Monthly Archive for October, 2009

Page 2 of 2

The “Guiding Light” Flickers Out

The  NY Post made the announcement on April 1. It was no April Fool joke. After 72 years of broadcasting, and with more than 15,700 episodes—CBS has pulled the drain plug on America’s longest running soap opera. The last episode aired Sept. 18.

It all began on NBC radio, Jan.25, 1937 as a 15-minute radio serial, moving to CBS radio in 1946, then to CBS TV in 1952, where it has stayed. What is unique in the genre is that even while building a TV audience, it continued as a radio drama for four additional years. The same actors played their characters in both media. In 1967 Guiding Light went to color, expanded its episode length to 30 minutes a year later, and finally settled into its signature one-hour format in 1977. During its run, it amassed 69 daytime Emmys. This is broadcast “history” of an unique order.

Speculation has been broad-based about the reasons for the demise of  Guiding Light. Some say its target audience of women have been so integrated into the American workplace, that stay at home moms are no longer a significant demographic. The usual suspects of cable TV and the internet are also cited.  Simply put, there are too many other options for women today.

Curious about all this, I started to track comments on the CBS website: “Guiding Light Community Message Board.” Here, a recurrent theme seems to be that the show’s writing has been badly misfiring for some time. Now, soap opera writing is not something about which I claim to be a scholar. But this one plea did sound a sympathetic chord:

Every time I sign onto CBS website there is a question of should CBS cancel The Guiding Light… but I keep wondering why would they want to cancel the longest running soap. And I get the answer every time I tune in to watch the show. The writers…They don’t know what they are doing. First of all, why is Josh trying to get Reva back. Don’t you know that people are tired of them. Jeffrey and Reva happen to be the best match on the show in years. They are fun together and fun to watch. I am sick of Josh and Reva. Stop back tracking and go forward. Then they go and mess up Billie and Lizzie. You messed that one up when you had Billie marry Ava, but now you have the opportunity to bring them back together and you are messing that up. You are trying to turn Billie into another Alan Spaulding, and there is only one. Their relationship was so romantic and you need to put the romance back in the show.

That is one woman’s opinion—but not that of the producers, as you will soon see. One thing I find so fascinating is just how broad is the spectrum of impassioned opinion about every detail of the show, the intricacies of which only a devoted viewer could follow.

The Wikipedia entry “soap opera” has a fascinating history of the genre since inception (even as an international genre)—more information than any single, sane person can wish to acquire:

Wikipedia entry link

In an effort to track some of this further, I searched several other sites. The arcanum destination for all things soap is Soap Opera Digest. You’ve seen the print version in the rack at your supermarket checkout. First appearing as a monthly magazine in Nov. of 1975, it is now published weekly. The subscription base is over half a million, with one million more copies being grabbed from newsstands.

I soon found myself lost in a farrago of chatter, plotlines and vociferous pleadings. I had hoped to track several intersecting stories to see how the final episodes are resolved—but I got lost very quickly in the dense tangle of adulteries, divorces, deaths and disappearances. And that is really partly the point. One thing that has been a staple of Guiding Light and the genre in toto is the “cliffhanger” at the end of every episode. I remember my mother watching this show and As The World Turns as she cleaned the house and how she would slow down her chores and finally stop altogether, sitting on the edge of the living room sofa as each day’s episode moved toward its climax. You could hear it coming as the underlying organ music swelled. Then BOOM—some unexpected line of dialogue with a plot turn would leave you hanging until the same time tomorrow.

One typical viewer is Dorothy Colhard. Her reminiscences are here:

Macon.com link

Beau Cabell/The Telegraph — Dorothy Colhard watches one of the final episodes of “Guiding Light” as Alexandra Spaulding leans on her dead brother’s hospital gurney. “When it’s over,” Colhard said, “I’ll just put on some classical music and pull out a book to read.” She’s been a fan of the series since 1941, when she listened to it on the radio with her grandmother.

Beau Cabell/The Telegraph — Dorothy Colhard watches one of the final episodes of “Guiding Light” as Alexandra Spaulding leans on her dead brother’s hospital gurney. “When it’s over,” Colhard said, “I’ll just put on some classical music and pull out a book to read.” She’s been a fan of the series since 1941, when she listened to it on the radio with her grandmother.

Guiding Light takes place in the fictional town of Springfield and tracks the lives of several families—Spaulding, Lewis and Cooper. The patriarch and oft-times dynastic villain (but a veritable linchpin of the series) has been Alan Spaulding who has been presumed dead several times over the decades and then has re-appeared in the guise of another actor, most recently played by Ron Raines from July 15, 1994 until the present. A staple of the genre has been these floating plot and character lines as actors have come and gone. Some of the actors who have played major roles over the years include James Earl Jones, Kevin Bacon and Hayden Panattiere.

These shifts have been anything but nimble and have contributed to the complicated timelines—ones that have confounded anyone but the most hardcore cadre of viewers. Take a look at this one of Alan Spaulding. Just scroll way down to see the convoluted life this man has led. Midway, you are given a “brief character history” that would confound a 19th century Russian novelist:

SoapCentral.com link

Two years ago while at a wedding reception Alan is gunned down. The most recent Wikipedia update for him tracks his final days:

During the reception of his wedding to Doris on February 16, 2007, Alan was shot and remained in critical condition for several weeks. He awakened as a new man full of love and forgiveness, but he soon reverted back to his evil self. The shooter was his stepdaughter Ashlee Wolfe February 20, 2007. It was revealed on April 4, 2007. He saved Reva’s life and to keep each other from telling anyone Reva moved into the Spaulding mansion. Alan volunteered to have a transplant, an extremely risky surgery to save his son Phillip’s life, in September of 2009. While recovering from the transplant, Alan attended the Lewis / Cooper Wedding with four Generations of Spauldings, Alan peacefully passed away on Tuesday September 15, 2009 on a bench in front of a lake, when Philip came over, and realized he was dead. He was cremated, and the private, family only funeral was held on Thursday September 17th, 2009. They put his remains in the same lake where he passed away.

Wow! Did you follow all that? If not, no matter, because it is at this point that we join the story. Here is a section from the next to last episode aired on Sept. 17, 2009.  As the Spaulding family comes together, Alan’s ashes are scattered at the lakeshore.  Something really different is going on here. In a TV series where wallpaper music seems to drone on as if in an endless loop, the banal music fades after a few seconds and there is only the sound of water lapping. Just as surprising, as the family,one by one, scatters the ashes, there is little dialogue. You will need to scroll to 18:20 and watch the obligatory commercial perhaps both when you hit play and again after you scroll down. Bear with it— no more than 30 seconds of commercials, not five minutes as on the TV broadcast.

FanCast.com link

The scene is shot in an almost artless way, looking self-conscious and stagey in the open air at the lakeshore. For decades, the shooting of Guiding Light had taken place largely in the studio. Interior sets, with at least three cameras on traditional pedestals that allowed stable compositions and controlled movement by skilled operators, defined the style. Dramatic lighting emphasized the melodrama as well as concealed sometimes-schematic sets. But about a year ago in an effort to cut production costs, Guiding Light abandoned its signature style, one that is common to many “soaps”.

Instead of the classic pattern of staging and shooting for multiple cameras within a basic proscenium axis, a switch was made to handheld, smaller cameras, in keeping with the shakycam aesthetic of its prime-time cousins. Expensive stages and sets were cut back and crew size was reduced. Stage lighting was replaced mostly by day exteriors. With all this went a radical change from the stylized, even hothouse, milieu of the stage to mundane, even generic, locations. The decision initially was an economic one but an unintended consequence was that it brought the characters into a real world three-dimensional space. This physical change also dictated a change in behavior as the actors became looser and more free form in their gestures and line readings. The camera style accommodated and contributed to this alteration in acting and choreography. The proscenium axis was broken. There were cuts to reverse angles and awkward eye lines. I kept expecting to catch a glimpse of another camera at the edge of frame.

One of the normative signs of the traditional style had been that the “world” of the action is in a space more abstract and alien from that where we real-life humans all live and work. This stylization helped embody a fantasy universe that defined the drama—unreal in look but somehow relatable on its own terms to the homebound viewer. This change in technique and location toward reality made it all seem more quotidian, more ordinary. At first look, it would seem to be desirable. But despite this change, the target audience continued to slowly drift away.

My own guess is that it is this very stylization and seeming irreality that is one of the soap’s markers of success. Just as the conceits of film-noir only succeed in a dark and spare frame, the heightened drama of internecine violence and betrayal in the soaps just do not play well in a style that looks as if it were photographed by your Uncle Charlie with his Handycam. For me as a filmmaker, it is this very disjunction between form and technique in the last years of “Guiding Light” that is so fascinating. This new style also makes often-uncomfortable looking actors seem awkward. If you take a few minutes to dip into any recent episode at random, I think you will see this disparity.

The final episode aired on Sept.  18. In it the multiple strands of the different families resolve. The most crucial is that of Reva and Joshua. Reva is the single character that most embodies the physical and emotional values of the target viewer. She is a Middle American Everywoman with a very real middle-aged face and body. She has been much troubled over the years but is on the verge of “finding myself.” In the last eight minutes of the last episode, it all comes together. In a public park, each story strand seems to find resolution even as Reva in a different location finally accepts Joshua as her life mate. The background lighthouse looms phallus-like in their scene’s every wide shot.  But then maybe sometimes a lighthouse is just a lighthouse.

Again, once you click on,  there is an episode index below the screen. Click on the episode for Sept. 18 and bear with the commercials after you scroll to 29:15 to start the final sequence. After the Joshua/Reva scene there is a final montage in the park as all the families come together, then back to Joshua and Reva as they drive off in his vintage Ford pick-up toward a hoped-for brighter future:

Fancast.com link

After 72 years, the title card no one ever could have anticipated dissolves onto the screen—“The End.”

But is it? Crystal Chappell who plays the character Olivia sees the show reincarnated as a web series titled  Venice which she says will “air” in November. One of the few unresolved plotlines is that of Olivia and Natalia, known to fans by the conjoined name “Otalia”. These two grown women have fallen in love. One anticipated event other than the scattering of Alan’s ashes and Reva and Joshua driving off into a life yet unknown, is: will the two women have a passionate onscreen kiss before the final fadeout? That question may only be answered online.

The cancelling of this soap opera is a cultural marker. While you and I may have little noted its passing, there are generations of viewers that found consolation in the series’ daily ministrations to a devoted congregation. Much like the Yuppie series  Seinfeld, Guiding Light gave a specific demographic its own voice in the Babel of our oft-times strident democracy.

Product Recall: Kodachrome Fades

Microsoft Word - Document4

This article is a “wake”. In June, the Eastman Kodak Co. announced that it is retiring Kodachrome film. Introduced in 1936 as a 35mm transparency (reversal) film for slides, Kodachrome was the dominant color film in still photography for nearly 75 years. Our own family histories and all of amateur photography would have been greatly impoverished by existing only in B/W.

Steve McCurry’s iconic photo of an Afghan girl for National Geographic Magazine in 1985 was made on Kodachrome.

0015slz1

When he returned to photograph the girl 17 years later in 2002, he used Ektachrome. Today, like most photojournalists who have pressing publication deadlines, Steve McCurry relies largely on digital cameras. A fascinating story of this photo sojourn from 1985—how the girl, now a grown woman, looks, and her history since then is here:

www.takegreatpictures.com article

In this Kodak sponsored Youtube video McCurry talks about his early desire to be a cinematographer, his discovery of the solitary allure of the single photo and of his abiding love for Kodachrome. There is a glitch skip at the head of the video, so just manually slide it all the way left:

If you have any undeveloped Kodachrome, still or motion picture film, there is still one place in all of these United States where you can have it developed: Parsons, Kansas at Dwayne’s Photo:

www.dwaynesphoto.com link

“In our mind’s eye, the Depression unfolded in black and white,” says Time photo editor Mark Rykoff. FSA photographers under the direction of Roy Stryker traveled the country documenting the poverty and hardship of this era. Walker Evans and Dorthea Lange created many of its most indelible images. The Library of Congress holds over 160,000 frames of the FSA work in B/W.

It was only in 1979 that a researcher discovered a long forgotten cache of color transparencies done by other FSA photographers, a dozen of them, including Russell Lee, Jack Delano and Marion Post Wolcott. There are only about 1600 frames in color, one one-hundredth of the B/W. But they are amazing to behold, collapsing a distant history with a surprising sense of immediacy. And they were photographed on Kodachrome. Here is a slideshow, narrated by Rykoff:

www.time.com “Farm Security Administration and the Dawn of Kodachrome” photo essay

We are also used to seeing WWII in B/W. But director George Stevens, with his film unit that included cameramen Joe Biroc and William Mellor, documented on 16mm Kodachrome the Normandy Invasion, the liberation of Paris, the Fall of Berlin and the discovery of the Dachau concentration camp. The footage of this historic journey was “lost” for decades but was discovered by his son, producer George Stevens, Jr. in near pristine condition and made into a documentary film available on DVD. The color is startling, even disconcerting, to certain critics who feel such indelible history on film somehow should be more sepia colored. You can judge for yourself on the DVD:

Amazon.com link

Here is writer Jeff Shannon’s description of the documentary:

Some of the most vivid, indelible images of World War II can be found in George Stevens: D-Day to Berlin. Along with an Army-enlisted band of Hollywood veterans ….. the great director of Gunga Din traveled from the shores of Normandy to the ruins of occupied Berlin, capturing pivotal episodes of history on home-movie magazines of Kodak color film, which his son later crafted into this riveting 46-minute documentary. The narration by Stevens Jr. is rather listless, and other voiceover contributors from the “Irregular” crew are not specifically identified, but their visual account speaks for itself, with unforgettable images of liberated Paris on August 25, 1944 (“the greatest day of my life,” said Stevens Sr.); the surrender of 320,000 troops in Germany’s Army Company B; the wretched aftermath of the Battle of the Bulge; the discovery of a gigantic underground V-1 bomb factory in Nordhausen, Germany; Hitler’s mountain hideaway in Berchtesgaden; and, most horrifically, piles of corpses at the Dachau concentration camp. The color images remain crisp and remarkably lifelike, as if they were shot just yesterday, bringing even greater significance and poignant importance to footage that will surely stand forever as a testament to some of humanity’s brightest and darkest hours. — Jeff Shannon

Youtube has a number of links that show WWII in Kodachrome color. This clip from an English documentary of D-Day and beyond brings a seminal event in 20th century world history into arresting immediacy. What a difference the color makes:

In 2002 Els Rijper published a photo history —Kodachrome: The American Invention of the World. Critic-historian A.D. Coleman’s opening essay “Mama, don’t take our Kodachrome away” cites Paul Simon’s like titled song:

Amazon.com link

I have had my own archival moment with Kodachrome. In spring and summer of 1969 I was working as camera assistant on a Disney film in Barrow, Alaska. I used Kodachrome in my 35SLR to photograph dozens of icebergs, ever shape-shifting in the Arctic light. Last year I found some of the stored slides. Almost 40 years afterwards they were still pristine.

An AP announcement from late June formalized the announcement of Kodachrome’s end:

Associated Press article

Here is a more detailed explanation of the history of Kodachrome including the revelation that it was pretty much a B/W film at capture stage. It is from an article by Claire Suddath in the June 23 online edition of Time magazine.

The Kodachrome process — in which three emulsions, each sensitive to a primary color, are coated on a single film base — was the brainchild of Leopold Godowsky Jr. and Leopold Mannes, two musicians turned scientists who worked at Kodak’s research facility in Rochester, N.Y. Disappointed by the poor quality of a “color” movie they saw in 1916, the two Leopolds spent years perfecting their technique, which Kodak first utilized in 1935 in 16mm movie film. The next year, they tried out the process on film for still cameras, although the procedure was not for the hobbyist: the earliest 35mm Kodachrome went for $3.50 a roll, or about $54 in today’s dollars.

While all color films have dyes printed directly onto the film stock, Kodachrome’s dye isn’t added until the development process. “The film itself is basically black and white,” says Grant Steinle, vice president of operations at Dwayne’s Photo in Parsons, Kans., the only photo-processing center still equipped to develop Kodachrome film. Steinle says that although all dyes will fade over time, if Kodachrome is stored properly it can be good for up to 100 years. The film’s archival abilities, coupled with its comparative ease of use, made it the dominant film for both professionals and amateurs for most of the 20th century. Kodachrome captured a color version of the Hindenburg’s fireball explosion in 1936. It accompanied Edmund Hillary to the top of Mount Everest in 1953. Abraham Zapruder was filming with 8mm Kodachrome in Dallas when he accidentally captured President Kennedy’s assassination. National Geographic photographer Steve McCurry used it to capture the haunting green-gray eyes of an Afghan refugee girl in 1985 in what is still the magazine’s most enduring cover image.

For 20 years, anyone wishing to develop Kodachrome film had to send it to a Kodak laboratory, which controlled all processing. In 1954, the Department of Justice declared Kodachrome-processing a monopoly, and the company agreed to allow other finishing plants to develop the film; the price of a roll of film — which previously had the processing cost added into it — fell roughly 43%. (Read about Kodak’s antitrust case.)

Kodachrome’s popularity peaked in the 1960s and ’70s, when Americans’ urge to catalog every single holiday, family vacation and birthday celebration hit its stride. Kodachrome II, a faster, more versatile version of the film, came out in 1961, making it even more appealing to the point-and-shoot generation. Super 8, a low-speed fine-grain Kodachrome movie film, was released in 1965 — and was used to film seemingly every wedding, beach holiday and backyard barbecue for the next decade. (Aficionados can check out the opening credits of the ’80s coming-of-age drama The Wonder Years for a quick hit of nostalgia.) When Paul Simon sang, “Mama, don’t take my Kodachrome away” in 1973, Kodak was still expanding its Kodachrome line, and it was hard to believe that it would ever disappear. But by the mid-1980s, video camcorders and more easily processed color film from companies like Fuji and Polaroid encroached on Kodachrome’s market share, and the film fell into disfavor. Compared to the newer technology, Kodachrome was a pain to develop. It required a large processing machine and several different chemicals and over a dozen processing steps. The film would never, ever be able to make the “one-hour photo” deadline that customers increasingly came to expect. Finally in the early 2000s came the digital-photography revolution; digital sales today account for more than 70% of Kodak’s revenue.

Kodak quit the film-processing business in 1988 and slowly began to disengage from film-manufacturing. Super 8 went by the wayside in 2007. By 2008 Kodak was producing only one Kodachrome film run — a mile-long sheet cut into 20,000 rolls — a year, and the number of centers able to process it had declined precipitously. Today, Steinle’s Kansas store processes all of Kodak’s Kodachrome film — if you drop a roll off at your local Wal-Mart, it will be developed at Dwayne’s Photo — and though it is the only center left in the world, the company processes only a few hundred rolls a day.

Kodachrome 64 slide film, discontinued on June 22, was the last type of true Kodachrome available — although the company expects existing stocks to last well into the fall…….

Here is another explanation of the Kodachrome emulsion structure that helps explain why it has been so stable over time. It is from an anonymous article titled “The Wonders of Kodachrome”:

www.subclub.org article

The key to the Kodachrome’s archival stability is that the color dyes (unlike Ektachrome and other E-6 Process films) are not placed in the film emulsion during manufacturing. Kodachrome is basically a black-and-white film with three light sensitive layers, each of which is “filtered” to record magenta, cyan, or yellow “light”. During film processing, the correct color dyes are introduced into the respective layers to produce the full-color positive image. This is a much more complicated operation (the original K-11 Process required 28 different steps) than processing color films in which color dyes are already within each of the emulsion layers. But, the Kodachrome approach provides far greater color stability.

You can make a sentimental journey through Kodachromes’s history at this 43-image gallery:

www.kodak.com Kodachrome slideshow

The images were made by Eric Meola, Peter Guttman and Steve McCurry.

The last rolls of this film will be given to the George Eastman House in Rochester. Some of them will be the final photographed Kodachrome images—and they will be made by Steve McCurry.

Do you wonder how much longer these film transparencies may survive than our digital photo files? I do.

R.I.P. Kodachrome. May your demise be a very, very slow fade.